OverviewStudy Guide
Back to Overview

All 4 Topics · Complete Reference

Chapter Study Guides

Comprehensive chapter-by-chapter reference covering all concepts, formulas, and comparative analyses for the Asset Management session. Sourced from Prof. Rosu's course materials.

Chapter 1

Asset Allocation & Modern Portfolio Theory

Core MPT framework, efficient frontier, Sharpe ratio, Black-Litterman model

1. Core Concepts

Asset Allocation

The process of distributing an investor's wealth across asset classes (stocks, bonds, real estate) to achieve the optimal balance between expected return and risk.

Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT)

Introduced by Harry Markowitz. Its core insight: diversification — combining assets that are not perfectly correlated — can significantly reduce overall portfolio risk without sacrificing return.

Mean-Variance Investor

An investor who makes decisions based solely on two parameters: the expected return (mean) and the risk (variance or standard deviation) of the portfolio.

Investment Opportunity (IO) Set

The set of all feasible portfolios that can be constructed from a given set of assets, plotted in the expected return–standard deviation (E, σ) space.

Efficient Frontier

The upper edge of the IO Set. Portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a defined level of risk. Any rational investor will choose a portfolio on this frontier.

Tangency (MVE) Portfolio

The portfolio on the efficient frontier that maximizes the Sharpe ratio — the point where the Capital Market Line is tangent to the risky asset frontier.

2. Key Formulas

Portfolio Expected Return (2 Assets)

EP = wA·EA + wB·EB

Portfolio Variance (2 Assets)

σP² = wA²σA² + wB²σB² + 2wAwBσAσBρA,B

Matrix Form (N Assets)

EP = w'E    |    σP² = w'Ωw

Sharpe Ratio

SR = (EP − rf) / σP

MVE Portfolio Weights

wMVE ∝ Ω⁻¹(E − rf·1)

GMV Portfolio Weights

wGMV ∝ Ω⁻¹·1

3. Comparative Analyses

Capital Allocation Line (CAL) vs. Capital Market Line (CML)

FeatureCALCML
DefinitionAll combinations of the risk-free asset and any specific risky portfolioThe specific CAL using the Tangency (MVE) Portfolio
SlopeSharpe Ratio of the chosen risky portfolioMaximum possible Sharpe Ratio
SignificanceShows risk-return tradeoff for a particular mixThe new Efficient Frontier when a risk-free asset exists

Tangency (MVE) Portfolio vs. Global Minimum Variance (GMV) Portfolio

FeatureMVE PortfolioGMV Portfolio
ObjectiveMaximizes the Sharpe RatioMinimizes absolute portfolio variance
LocationTangency point of CML with risky frontierLeftmost point (nose) of the hyperbola
Formulaw ∝ Ω⁻¹(E − rf·1)w ∝ Ω⁻¹·1

4. Black-Litterman Model

While MPT is theoretically sound, it is highly sensitive to input estimates. The Black-Litterman (BL) model addresses this by combining market equilibrium returns with an investor's subjective views.

BL Prior

Starts from the assumption that the market portfolio is efficient. Equilibrium returns: μeq = δΩwM

Investor Views

The investor specifies absolute or relative views on asset returns, with a degree of confidence (matrix U).

Posterior Portfolio

Bayesian updating combines prior + views. Optimal portfolio = benchmark + weighted sum of view portfolios.